Twisha Sharma — The 33-year-old former Miss Pune and MBA graduate whose tragic death sparked a national outcry for justice.
Twisha Sharma Dowry Death Case: A Tragedy That Shook India's Conscience
📋 Table of Contents
- 1. Introduction: Who Was Twisha Sharma?
- 2. The Marriage That Turned Into a Nightmare
- 3. The Fateful Night: May 12, 2026
- 4. The FIR and Initial Investigation
- 5. Complete Timeline of Events
- 6. The Accused: Samarth Singh and Giribala Singh
- 7. Major Controversies and Allegations
- 8. Legal Provisions Applied in the Case
- 9. Supreme Court's Suo Motu Intervention
- 10. CBI Takes Over: What Happens Now?
- 11. The Family's Unwavering Fight for Justice
- 12. Lessons from the Twisha Sharma Case
- 13. Conclusion: Justice Delayed But Not Denied?
1. Introduction: Who Was Twisha Sharma?
Imagine a young woman full of dreams, ambition, and talent. A woman who had already achieved what many only dream of — she was Miss Pune 2012, an accomplished MBA graduate, a model, and an actor who worked with some of the biggest names in the Indian entertainment industry. She was independent, educated, and came from a respectable family in Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Her name was Twisha Sharma, and she was just 33 years old when her life was tragically cut short.
Twisha was not just another statistic in India's long and shameful history of dowry deaths. She was a real person with a real story — a story of love, hope, betrayal, and ultimately, a death that has left the entire nation asking one painful question: "How many more Twishas must we lose before dowry deaths become a thing of the past?"
On May 12, 2026, just five months after her marriage to advocate Samarth Singh in Bhopal, Twisha was found dead under highly suspicious circumstances at her matrimonial home. What followed was not just a police investigation — it became a national movement for justice, a test of India's legal system, and a mirror held up to the deep-rooted evils of dowry harassment and institutional bias that still plague our society.
💡 Key Fact: Twisha Sharma's case became one of the most high-profile dowry death investigations in recent Indian history, leading to suo motu intervention by the Supreme Court of India and a CBI probe.
2. The Marriage That Turned Into a Nightmare
Twisha Sharma and Samarth Singh's story began like many modern Indian marriages — through a matrimonial website in 2024. Twisha, working as a Communication and Onboarding Manager at a corporate firm in Delhi, was looking for a life partner. Samarth Singh was an advocate practicing in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, and the son of Giribala Singh, a retired District and Sessions Judge.
Their engagement took place on May 12, 2025, in Noida. The wedding followed in December 2025. On the surface, it seemed like a perfect match — an educated, independent woman marrying into a family with legal pedigree and social standing. But beneath this facade of respectability, dark forces were already at work.
According to allegations later made by Twisha's family, the marriage was plagued by dowry demands and mental harassment from the very beginning. Twisha's brother, Major Harshit Sharma (an officer in the Indian Army), and her sister-in-law, Captain Dr. Rashi Abrol, both serving in the Armed Forces, would later reveal shocking details about the treatment Twisha endured during her brief marriage.
📖 Related Reading: Learn about the legal differences between Streedhan vs Dowry — two concepts that are often confused but have very different legal meanings and consequences under Indian law.
3. The Fateful Night: May 12, 2026
The night of May 12, 2026, changed everything. Twisha Sharma was found unconscious at her matrimonial home in the Katara Hills area of Bhopal. She was rushed to AIIMS Bhopal, where doctors declared her brought dead.
The initial postmortem report concluded that the cause of death was "asphyxia due to antemortem hanging by ligature." In simple words, the doctors said it was suicide by hanging. But from the very beginning, Twisha's family refused to accept this explanation. They raised serious questions about:
- The missing nylon gym rope allegedly used in the hanging — police did not produce it during the autopsy, presenting it only a day later
- The condition of the body and the circumstances surrounding the death
- The delay in informing the family about Twisha's condition
- The conduct of the accused family in the immediate aftermath
What made the case even more suspicious was the fact that CCTV cameras installed at the residence had a mysterious "technical defect" — the timestamp was running approximately 2 days and 2 hours behind the actual time. This "defect" conveniently made it impossible to verify what actually happened on the night of Twisha's death.
⚠️ Red Flags in the Initial Investigation:
- CCTV timestamp discrepancy of over 48 hours
- Missing evidence (nylon rope) not produced during autopsy
- Accused husband went absconding immediately after FIR
- Retired judge mother-in-law secured anticipatory bail within hours
- Police initially downplayed the dowry harassment angle
4. The FIR and Initial Investigation
On May 15, 2026, the Bhopal Police registered an FIR at Katara Hills Police Station under the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. The FIR included charges related to:
- Matrimonial cruelty
- Domestic violence
- Dowry death
- Abetment to suicide
The accused named in the FIR were:
- Samarth Singh — Twisha's husband and an advocate
- Giribala Singh — Samarth's mother and a retired District and Sessions Judge
However, instead of cooperating with the investigation, Samarth Singh immediately went into hiding. The Bhopal Police announced a reward of Rs. 10,000 for information leading to his arrest, which was later increased to Rs. 30,000. Meanwhile, Giribala Singh managed to secure anticipatory bail from a local court — a move that Twisha's family claimed was influenced by her former judicial position.
The Bhopal Police also constituted a six-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the case, but Twisha's family and the growing public outcry demanded nothing less than a CBI investigation.
5. Complete Timeline of Events
Here is the complete chronological breakdown of everything that happened in the Twisha Sharma case:
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2025 | Engagement ceremony in Noida | Twisha and Samarth get engaged |
| December 2025 | Marriage in Delhi | Twisha moves to Bhopal with Samarth |
| May 12, 2026 | Twisha found dead at matrimonial home | Body taken to AIIMS Bhopal; declared brought dead |
| May 13, 2026 | Police "access" CCTV DVR system | System shows timestamp 2 days behind; family alleges tampering |
| May 15, 2026 | FIR registered at Katara Hills Police Station | Charges under BNS for dowry death, cruelty, domestic violence |
| May 15, 2026 | Giribala Singh gets anticipatory bail | Family alleges judicial influence; public outrage begins |
| May 16, 2026 | 6-member SIT formed by Bhopal Police | Initial investigation begins; Samarth absconding |
| May 17, 2026 | Family protests at CM residence | Demands CBI probe and justice |
| May 18, 2026 | Sessions court rejects Samarth's anticipatory bail | Court cites unnatural death within 6 months of marriage |
| May 19, 2026 | Family meets CM Mohan Yadav | CM assures CBI probe; family demands second autopsy |
| May 20, 2026 | Bhopal court rejects plea for second postmortem | Family moves High Court |
| May 21, 2026 | MP Home Dept transfers probe to CBI | State government recommends CBI investigation |
| May 22, 2026 | Samarth surrenders at Jabalpur High Court | Taken into custody; Bar Council suspends his license |
| May 22, 2026 | High Court orders second autopsy by AIIMS Delhi team | To be conducted under full video recording |
| May 23, 2026 | Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance | CJI Surya Kant-led bench to hear the matter |
| May 24, 2026 | Twisha cremated after second autopsy | 12 days after death; Major Harshit performs last rites |
| May 25, 2026 | SC hearing on institutional bias | Court restrains both families from media statements |
| May 28, 2026 | MP High Court cancels Giribala's anticipatory bail | CBI arrests Giribala Singh |
| June 1, 2026 | CBI recreates crime scene using dummies | Forensic investigation at Giribala's house |
| June 2, 2026 | Both accused sent to judicial custody | Samarth and Giribala in jail; CBI probe ongoing |
6. The Accused: Samarth Singh and Giribala Singh
Samarth Singh — The Husband
Samarth Singh was an advocate practicing in Bhopal. After Twisha's death, instead of cooperating with the investigation, he went into hiding for over 10 days. When he finally surfaced, he approached the Jabalpur High Court to surrender, but was taken into custody by police from the court premises itself.
Samarth's defense strategy has been to:
- Deny all dowry allegations, claiming he and his mother transferred over Rs. 7 lakh to Twisha's account
- Allege Twisha had drug addiction and mental health issues
- Claim WhatsApp chats were edited by Twisha's family
- Argue the prosecution's case is built on "imagination and presumptions"
However, the Bar Council of India took a strong stand and suspended Samarth's advocate license, with Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra citing the "seriousness of the case."
Giribala Singh — The Mother-in-Law
Perhaps the most controversial figure in this case is Giribala Singh, Samarth's mother and a retired District and Sessions Judge. Her background as a former judicial officer has been at the center of the allegations of institutional bias and evidence tampering.
Twisha's family has accused Giribala of:
- Using her judicial influence to manipulate the initial police investigation
- Leaking selective, doctored CCTV footage to social media to create a narrative
- Tampering with evidence at the crime scene
- Obstructing the investigation by not cooperating with police
- Conducting a "posthumous character trial" of Twisha through press conferences
Giribala's anticipatory bail was eventually cancelled by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, and she was arrested by the CBI on May 28, 2026.
7. Major Controversies and Allegations
The Twisha Sharma case is not just about one woman's death. It has exposed deep flaws in how India's institutions handle cases involving powerful accused. Here are the major controversies:
🚨 Controversy 1: Institutional Bias and Judicial Influence
The fact that the prime accused's mother was a retired District Judge raised immediate concerns about whether the local police and lower courts were influenced. Twisha's family alleged that:
- Police did not seal the crime scene properly
- Evidence was not collected according to protocol
- Giribala Singh was given preferential treatment
- The anticipatory bail was granted suspiciously quickly
🚨 Controversy 2: Evidence Tampering
The CCTV footage became a major flashpoint. The DVR system had a timestamp running 2 days and 2 hours behind the actual time. Twisha's family alleged this was not a "technical defect" but deliberate tampering to hide what really happened on May 12, 2026.
Additionally, the nylon gym rope allegedly used in the hanging was:
- Not produced during the initial autopsy
- Presented to doctors a day later
- Its origin and handling raised serious forensic questions
🚨 Controversy 3: The Posthumous Character Trial
Perhaps one of the most disturbing aspects of this case has been the systematic attempt to malign Twisha's character after her death. The accused family, particularly Giribala Singh, held press conferences claiming:
- Twisha had mental health issues
- She was a drug addict
- She was financially demanding
- WhatsApp chats were selectively edited by her family
This pattern of blaming the victim instead of answering for the circumstances of her death is a sadly common tactic in dowry death cases, and Twisha's family has fiercely demanded an end to this "posthumous character trial."
📖 Related Reading: Understand your rights under the Alimony Rules in India for Wife — including protections under the Domestic Violence Act and how women can claim monetary relief and compensation.
8. Legal Provisions Applied in the Case
The Twisha Sharma case involves multiple legal provisions from the newly enacted criminal laws. Here is a breakdown of the key sections applied:
| Legal Provision | Description | Punishment |
|---|---|---|
| Section 85 BNS (Earlier 498A IPC) |
Cruelty by husband or relatives of husband | Up to 3 years imprisonment + fine |
| Section 80 BNS (Earlier 304B IPC) |
Dowry Death — death of a woman within 7 years of marriage under unnatural circumstances linked to dowry demands | Minimum 7 years, up to life imprisonment |
| Section 108 BNS (Earlier 306 IPC) |
Abetment of suicide | Up to 10 years imprisonment + fine |
| Section 318 BNS (Earlier 201 IPC) |
Causing disappearance of evidence | Up to 7 years imprisonment + fine |
| Section 319 BNS (Earlier 202 IPC) |
Intentional omission to give information to authorities | Up to 6 months imprisonment + fine |
| Section 336 BNS | Wrongful confinement | Up to 1 year imprisonment + fine |
| Section 351 BNS | Criminal intimidation | Up to 2 years imprisonment + fine |
| Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 | Giving or taking dowry | Up to 5 years imprisonment + fine of Rs. 15,000 |
📌 Important Legal Point: Under Section 80 BNS (Dowry Death), the law presumes that if a woman dies under unnatural circumstances within 7 years of marriage, and there is evidence of dowry harassment, the burden of proof shifts to the accused. The accused must prove they did not cause the death — a significant legal advantage for the prosecution.
📖 Related Reading: Explore the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — a landmark law that gave women absolute property rights and recognized them as equal heirs, a crucial protection for married women facing dowry harassment.
9. Supreme Court's Suo Motu Intervention
On May 23, 2026, the Supreme Court of India took suo motu cognisance of the Twisha Sharma case — a rare and powerful step that signaled the highest court's deep concern about the case. A three-judge Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi registered the case as:
"IN RE: ALLEGED INSTITUTIONAL BIAS AND PROCEDURAL DISCREPANCIES IN THE UNNATURAL DEATH OF A YOUNG WOMAN AT HER MATRIMONIAL HOME"
The Supreme Court's intervention was driven by several factors:
- Allegations of institutional bias due to the accused's judicial connections
- Procedural lapses by the Bhopal Police in the initial investigation
- Media narrative that suggested a fair investigation was being denied
- Public outrage and the need to restore faith in the justice system
Key Directions by the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court made several important observations and directions:
- Restrained both families from making public statements to the media, urging them to present their versions before investigating agencies instead
- Asked the media to exercise restraint and avoid recording statements of potential witnesses/accused that could prejudice the investigation
- Expressed pain at how the case was being handled and the media trial surrounding it
- Directed the CBI to take over the investigation immediately
- Emphasized that the judiciary's reputation was at stake and justice must not only be done but seen to be done
⚖️ Supreme Court's Powerful Message:
The CJI-led bench made it clear that when a young woman dies under suspicious circumstances within months of marriage, and the accused family has connections to the judiciary, the justice system must go the extra mile to ensure transparency and fairness. The Court's suo motu action was a message to every powerful accused in India: "No one is above the law."
10. CBI Takes Over: What Happens Now?
On May 21, 2026, the Madhya Pradesh Home Department officially transferred the investigation to the CBI. The CBI re-registered the case and began a fresh, independent probe. Here's what the CBI has done so far:
- Re-examined all forensic evidence collected by the Bhopal Police
- Conducted a second autopsy by a team of forensic experts from AIIMS Delhi, performed under full video recording
- Recreated the crime scene at Giribala Singh's house using dummies on June 1, 2026
- Analyzed Call Detail Records (CDRs) and WhatsApp chats
- Examined the CCTV DVR system for tampering evidence
- Questioned both accused in judicial custody
The CBI's involvement brings hope that the truth will come out, free from local influence and bias. However, the case also highlights a troubling reality: why does it take national outrage and Supreme Court intervention for a dowry death case to get a fair investigation?
📖 Related Reading: Learn about Ex Post Facto Law — an important constitutional principle that protects citizens from being punished for actions that were legal when committed, relevant to understanding how new criminal laws apply.
11. The Family's Unwavering Fight for Justice
If there is one thing that has defined the Twisha Sharma case, it is the relentless courage of her family. Led by her brother Major Harshit Sharma and sister-in-law Captain Dr. Rashi Abrol — both serving officers in the Indian Armed Forces — the family has fought a battle on multiple fronts:
🎖️ Their Demands
- CBI investigation — achieved
- Second autopsy by AIIMS Delhi — achieved
- Cancellation of Giribala's anticipatory bail — achieved
- Arrest of both accused — achieved
- Fair trial without media interference — ongoing
- Justice for Twisha — the ultimate goal
🎖️ Their Sacrifices
- They refused to cremate Twisha's body for 12 days until a second autopsy was conducted
- They faced character assassination and accusations of being "publicity seekers"
- They had to fight legal battles on multiple fronts while grieving
- They stood firm against a family with judicial and political connections
🎖️ A Family's Unbreakable Resolve
Major Harshit Sharma performed his sister's last rites at Bhopal's Bhadbhada Vishram Ghat on May 24, 2026 — 12 days after her death. It was not just a cremation; it was a statement that they would not rest until justice was served. As Major Sharma said in one of his media statements: "We are soldiers. We fight for the nation. Now we fight for our sister."
12. Lessons from the Twisha Sharma Case
The Twisha Sharma case is not just a tragedy — it is a wake-up call for Indian society and its institutions. Here are the critical lessons we must learn:
📌 Lesson 1: Dowry Is Still Killing Women in 2026
Despite decades of laws, awareness campaigns, and education, dowry deaths continue to happen. Twisha Sharma was an educated, independent, accomplished woman — and even she could not escape the dowry trap. This tells us that education alone is not enough; we need a fundamental shift in societal attitudes.
📌 Lesson 2: Power and Influence Can Corrupt Justice
The allegations of institutional bias in this case are a stark reminder that when the accused are powerful or well-connected, the justice system can fail the victim. The fact that it took Supreme Court intervention to ensure a fair investigation is deeply troubling.
📌 Lesson 3: The Media Must Be Responsible
The Supreme Court's direction to the media to exercise restraint is important. While media coverage can pressure authorities to act, it can also prejudice investigations and turn trials into public spectacles. Both the victim's and accused's families were making statements to the media, creating a toxic environment.
📌 Lesson 4: Families Must Know Their Rights
Twisha's family knew exactly what to demand — CBI probe, second autopsy, cancellation of bail, forensic examination. Their legal awareness and persistence made all the difference. Every family facing dowry harassment must know:
- Section 80 BNS (Dowry Death) — the law is on your side
- Section 85 BNS (Cruelty) — mental and physical harassment is a crime
- Right to a second autopsy — if you doubt the first one
- Right to demand CBI investigation — if local police are compromised
- Right to legal aid — free lawyers are available
📌 Lesson 5: The New Criminal Laws Must Deliver
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 replaced the colonial-era IPC. The Twisha Sharma case is one of the first major tests of these new laws. Will they deliver faster justice? Will they protect victims better? Only time will tell.
📖 Related Reading: Understand Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — how daughters were granted equal rights as sons in ancestral property, a landmark reform for women's empowerment in India.
13. Conclusion: Justice Delayed But Not Denied?
The Twisha Sharma dowry death case is far from over. As of June 2026, both Samarth Singh and Giribala Singh are in judicial custody, and the CBI investigation is ongoing. Crime scene reconstruction has been completed, forensic evidence is being analyzed, and the legal process is moving forward.
But this case has already achieved something important — it has forced India to confront uncomfortable truths:
- That dowry is not a thing of the past
- That powerful accused can manipulate investigations
- That the justice system needs constant vigilance
- That a family's fight for justice can move mountains
Twisha Sharma's death was a tragedy. But if her case leads to:
- Stricter enforcement of anti-dowry laws
- Better protection for women in matrimonial homes
- More accountability for police in dowry death investigations
- Greater awareness among women about their legal rights
Then perhaps her death will not be entirely in vain. As the Supreme Court itself signaled through its suo motu intervention: "Justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done."
🕯️ Remembering Twisha Sharma:
She was 33 years old. She was Miss Pune 2012. She was an MBA graduate. She was a model and actor. She was a daughter, a sister, a niece. She was a woman who deserved to live. Her name was Twisha Sharma, and India will not forget her.
#JusticeForTwisha
14. Women's Rights and Legal Protections in Dowry Death Cases
The Twisha Sharma case has once again brought the spotlight on the legal protections available to women in India against dowry harassment and domestic violence. Understanding these rights is not just important for victims — it is essential for every woman, every family member, and every citizen who believes in justice.
📜 Key Legal Protections for Women in India
India has one of the most comprehensive legal frameworks in the world for protecting women from dowry-related harassment. Here are the key laws every woman must know:
- Section 80 BNS (Dowry Death): If a woman dies under unnatural circumstances within 7 years of marriage, and there is evidence of dowry demands, the law presumes the husband or relatives caused the death. The burden of proof shifts to the accused.
- Section 85 BNS (Cruelty by Husband/Relatives): Any wilful conduct that drives a woman to commit suicide or causes grave injury to her life, limb, or health is punishable with up to 3 years imprisonment.
- Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: This civil law provides protection orders, residence orders, monetary relief, custody orders, and compensation orders to victims of domestic violence.
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: Prohibits the giving or taking of dowry and makes both parties punishable.
- Section 498A IPC (Now Section 85 BNS): Specifically addresses cruelty by husband or his relatives, including mental and physical harassment for dowry.
🛡️ What Should a Woman Do If She Faces Dowry Harassment?
If you or someone you know is facing dowry harassment, here are the immediate steps to take:
- Document everything: Keep records of all demands, threats, and incidents. Save WhatsApp chats, call recordings, and emails.
- Inform your family: Do not suffer in silence. Your family is your first line of support.
- File a complaint: Go to the nearest police station and file a written complaint. If the police refuse, approach the Magistrate directly.
- Contact the National Commission for Women (NCW): The NCW has a 24/7 helpline and can intervene in serious cases.
- Seek legal aid: Free legal aid is available under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
- Apply for protection under the Domestic Violence Act: You can get a protection order, residence order, and monetary relief.
- Do not sign any document under pressure: Many women are forced to sign false statements or settlement papers. Never sign anything without legal advice.
⚠️ Critical Advice: If you feel your life is in immediate danger, do not hesitate to call 112 (Emergency Response) or 181 (Women's Helpline). Your safety is the top priority.
15. The Role of Media in High-Profile Criminal Cases
The Twisha Sharma case has also sparked an important debate about the role of media in criminal investigations. The Supreme Court's direction to the media to exercise restraint is a reminder that while a free press is essential for democracy, it must also be responsible.
📺 The Double-Edged Sword of Media Coverage
Media coverage of the Twisha Sharma case had both positive and negative impacts:
| Positive Impact | Negative Impact |
|---|---|
| Pressure on authorities to act | Prejudice against accused before trial |
| Public awareness about dowry deaths | Character assassination of victim |
| Support for victim's family | Leakage of sensitive evidence |
| Demand for CBI investigation | Trial by media instead of courts |
| Highlighting institutional bias | Emotional manipulation of public opinion |
The Supreme Court rightly observed that "justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done." Media plays a crucial role in ensuring this, but it must not become a substitute for the judicial process.
16. The Need for Systemic Change
The Twisha Sharma case is not an isolated incident. It is part of a larger pattern that reveals deep flaws in how India's criminal justice system handles cases involving powerful accused. Here is what needs to change:
🔧 Police Reforms
- Mandatory body cameras for police during arrest and investigation
- Strict protocols for preserving crime scenes in dowry death cases
- Independent oversight of police investigations involving judicial or political connections
- Training for police officers on handling sensitive cases with empathy and professionalism
- Automatic CBI referral in cases where local police are compromised
🔧 Judicial Reforms
- Fast-track courts exclusively for dowry death and domestic violence cases
- Strict scrutiny of anticipatory bail applications in dowry death cases
- Mandatory second autopsy in all suspicious dowry death cases
- Protection of witnesses and victim's families from intimidation
🔧 Social Reforms
- Education about dowry laws in schools and colleges
- Community awareness programs about women's rights
- Support groups for women facing dowry harassment
- Economic empowerment of women to reduce dependence on matrimonial homes
📖 Related Reading: Learn about Alimony Rules in India for Wife — financial protections available to women after separation or divorce, including maintenance under Section 125 CrPC and the Domestic Violence Act.
17. Final Thoughts: Will Twisha Sharma Get Justice?
As the CBI investigation continues and the legal process moves forward, one question haunts every Indian who has followed this case: Will Twisha Sharma get justice?
The answer depends on many factors — the strength of the evidence, the fairness of the trial, the integrity of the investigators, and the courage of the witnesses. But more than anything, it depends on whether India's institutions are willing to hold the powerful accountable.
Twisha Sharma was not just a victim of dowry harassment. She was a victim of a system that too often protects the powerful and silences the weak. Her case has become a symbol of the fight against:
- Institutional bias in criminal investigations
- Judicial influence compromising fair trials
- Police apathy in handling sensitive cases
- Social tolerance of dowry and domestic violence
If the Twisha Sharma case leads to meaningful reforms in any of these areas, her death will have served a purpose beyond her own life. If it becomes just another forgotten headline, then we will have failed not just Twisha, but every woman who suffers in silence.
🕯️ A Nation's Promise:
Twisha Sharma's story is not over. It is being written every day in courtrooms, in newsrooms, in living rooms, and in the hearts of millions of Indians who demand justice. Let us ensure that her story ends not with tragedy, but with triumph — the triumph of truth over power, of justice over influence, and of a nation's conscience over its complacency.
#JusticeForTwisha #EndDowryDeaths #WomenSafety
COMMENTS